[Bro-Dev] Configuration framework syntax proposal
johanna at corelight.com
Thu Sep 21 08:37:16 PDT 2017
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 02:57:31PM +0000, Siwek, Jon wrote:
> > I'm not sure how exposing something like "input.pcap.filter" is any different from exposing something like "Pcap::filter" from that standpoint. Maybe there's a larger discussion here around what the user experience should look like? I feel like two different things are being talked about now.
> I’m thinking on the same lines.
Yes, I can see that argument.
> > Directly using variable names in UI elements is not unheard of though, a lot of UI frameworks will do things like present a variable like user_name as "User Name" in the UI. This is usually a simple text transform like
> >>>> s='My_Program::user_name'
> >>>> s.replace("::", " - ").replace("_", " ").title()
> > 'My Program - User Name’
> Yeah, I’ve noticed this approach in other UIs as well.
I admittedly did not think of this - that could work as a neat default.
The only thing that I would like to avoid (which is obviously separate
from this) is internally remapping variable names to configuration names
in a non-reversible manner; then one suddenly has to think about what to
do when names conflict (several variable names being able to automatically
map to the same configuration name). But - that seem to be separate
More information about the bro-dev